Twitter, now rebranded as X, has long held a reputation as one of the more toxic social media platforms, a trend that’s only become more pronounced in recent years. While the site has always been a breeding ground for heated discourse, the shift seems sharper now than it was in the past. A big reason for this stems from the sheer volume of users from vastly different backgrounds and belief systems all occupying the same space. On top of that, the platform’s entire design encourages the rapid spread of opinions and interests through retweets and hashtags, amplifying both positive and negative conversations.
At its core, this structure has allowed massive communities of like-minded people to come together—sometimes for the better, sometimes for the worse. But in today’s social media landscape, especially with the way X has evolved alongside shifting generational trends, it feels like the platform has become more driven by toxicity, rage, and endless discourse than ever before. So, what changed? Why does the modern version of Twitter feel so much more hostile?
To understand this, we need to look at some of the root causes behind this wave of negativity. The most obvious culprit is anonymity. When people engage online, safely tucked behind a screen and a profile picture, they often forget there’s a real person on the receiving end of their words. The lack of face-to-face interaction strips away empathy, making it easier for people to dehumanize each other. What would normally be a minor disagreement in real life can spiral into unhinged hostility. It’s why you often see users hurling insults, threats, and shockingly cruel remarks over trivial matters—behavior that would feel absurd and socially unacceptable in person.
Then there’s the phenomenon of overreaction, where even the smallest comment or perceived slight can explode into a massive, hate-fueled debate. At times, it seems like people are searching for reasons to be upset, blowing situations out of proportion just to stay angry. Why? Because anger gets attention. Discourse, especially the toxic kind, thrives on visibility. People often engage in arguments not to solve issues but to chase the rush of engagement—likes, retweets, and the spectacle of going viral.
This behavior even has a name: rage-baiting. It’s the act of deliberately posting inflammatory opinions to provoke outrage and start a firestorm of responses. Sometimes it’s done for humor, poking fun at how easily people can be triggered, but more often, it’s a tactic used with genuine malicious intent. Users will ignite drama just for the thrill of watching the chaos unfold, feeding into the cycle of negativity that defines so much of the platform today.
Another major issue plaguing the platform is virtue signaling. Virtue signaling is essentially the act of publicly showcasing moral superiority, often by exaggerating or outright lying about one’s beliefs to gain attention, praise, or social standing. It’s less about genuine activism and more about curating an image of being morally upright, without taking any real accountability or contributing to positive change.
A common example would be someone going out of their way to denounce a popular artist after a scandal, aggressively telling others that if they still support the artist, they’re part of the problem too. These posts rarely focus on meaningful dialogue or justice; instead, they aim to attract engagement and boost the poster’s image. You can scroll through your feed on any given day and find countless examples—performative outrage, overblown criticism, and users loudly condemning others just to seem like they’re on the “right side.” It creates an endless cycle of self-congratulation while often ignoring the nuances of the situations being discussed.
This mindset feeds directly into a larger issue on the platform: engagement farming. Twitter has evolved into a space where attention, not authenticity, is the ultimate currency. People craft posts designed not to inform or connect, but to provoke—whether it’s outrage bait, recycled “hot takes,” or performative kindness aimed solely at harvesting likes and retweets. The original intent of the platform, a space for open communication and global connection, feels buried under layers of clout-chasing and moral posturing.
Perhaps the most extreme byproduct of this behavior is cancel culture, which in theory can be a tool for holding public figures accountable. At its core, the idea of calling out harmful actions and spreading awareness is important—but the way Twitter weaponizes it has twisted the concept into something far more destructive. Instead of seeking truth or accountability, it often devolves into public shaming and the pursuit of social points.
A prime example of how cancel culture can spiral into unfair targeting happened back in 2018 with YouTuber ProJared. He was hit with serious accusations that spread like wildfire across social media, with Twitter leading the charge in condemning him. Users piled on without waiting for facts, eager to be seen condemning the alleged behavior. His career was nearly destroyed overnight, not because of solid evidence, but because two people made accusations without proof—chasing attention and personal gain. The court of public opinion declared him guilty before he had a chance to respond. Months later, when ProJared finally broke his silence with actual evidence and receipts debunking the accusations, the damage had already been done. His situation is a cautionary tale of how quickly online mobs can form, not out of a genuine desire for justice, but from a need to feel included in the “right side” of the narrative.
Unfortunately, this pattern isn’t just limited to public figures. More recently, something disturbingly similar occurred closer to home at CFHS. Several students were impersonated and slandered on the platform, all targeted through burner accounts run by fellow students. These accounts spread lies and harmful rumors, with no regard for the emotional harm inflicted on the victims. Names won’t be shared for obvious reasons, but it’s yet another example of how Twitter’s culture can blur the lines between personal attacks and entertainment. The detachment of the screen makes it easy to forget that real people are behind the usernames being targeted.
However, despite the platform’s issues, it’s not all bad. Twitter still holds value as a space where people from all walks of life can connect, share ideas, and discover communities they might never have encountered otherwise. It’s especially beneficial for artists, musicians, and creators who want to showcase their work to a global audience. When used right, the platform has the potential to be a hub for creativity, activism, and meaningful conversations.
I can only hope that as social media evolves, Twitter (or X) will move away from the current culture of rage-baiting, virtue signaling, and hostility. There’s still a chance for it to return to what it was meant to be: a space where people can share ideas, grow, and engage with the world in positive ways.
If I could leave you with any advice as you navigate the chaos of Twitter, it would be these things: always fact-check before reacting. Social media thrives on speed—posts go viral in seconds, and it’s easy to get swept up in the momentum of a trending topic. But no matter how convincing a tweet might seem, never take a stranger’s word as absolute truth. Even when they present evidence, stay cautious. Misinformation can be dressed up to look credible, and stories often unfold in layers. Wait until multiple sources have weighed in or more context has surfaced before forming conclusions. Jumping to assumptions only fuels the cycle of misinformation and unnecessary harm.
Second—and this is a tough one to remember sometimes—everyone behind a screen is still a person, even the ones stirring up negativity. It’s easy to dehumanize people when all you see is a profile picture and a string of bad takes. But letting rage-baiters drag you into their storm only adds fuel to the fire. If someone is deliberately posting inflammatory content to provoke a reaction, the best thing you can do is resist that impulse to lash out. Responding with threats or aggressive language doesn’t make a point—it just gives them the reaction they wanted. Instead, try to stay civil, engage with clarity if you must respond, or better yet, block them and move on with your day. You can’t control how others behave, but you can control how you respond.
Finally, consider using Twitter less as a place for mindless entertainment and more as a platform for genuine connection and community. Sure, the humor and viral posts can be fun—sometimes hilarious, even. But Twitter has so much more potential than just being a stage for fleeting jokes and hot takes. It’s a space where you can share ideas, discover like-minded people, support creators you admire, and engage in meaningful conversations about the things you care about. There’s value in that—value in using social media not just to consume, but to contribute, to connect, and to grow.
At its core, that’s what Twitter should be: a place where ideas thrive, voices are heard, and people build each other up rather than tearing each other down. And while the platform itself may not be perfect, the way you choose to engage can make a difference. So use it wisely.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login